翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Tessling ・ R v Therens ・ R v Thomas ・ R v Thomas Equipment Ltd ・ R v Tse ・ R v Turcotte ・ R v Turpin ・ R v Tutton ・ R v U (FJ) ・ R v Vaillancourt ・ R v Van der Peet ・ R v Verity-Amm ・ R v Victor ・ R v Viljoen ・ R v W (D) ・ R v Walker ・ R v Wallace ・ R v Wang ・ R v Wanhalla ・ R v Waterfield ・ R v Wells ・ R v Whitfield ・ R v Wholesale Travel Group Inc ・ R v Wigglesworth ・ R v Williams ・ R v Wong ・ R v Woodrow ・ R v Woollin ・ R v Wray ・ R v Zikalala Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Walker ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Walker ''R v Walker'' was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959. It was the first such prosecution involving written material in nearly two decades and set a precedent for using the act to prosecute web fiction. In December 2009, the defendant, English Civil Servant Darryn Walker was charged with publishing an obscene story on the Internet contrary to Section 2(1) of the Act. Media controversy was generated because the story in question was a real person fiction text horror story describing the imagined murder of the members of British pop group Girls Aloud. The case was abruptly abandoned on its first day and the defendant was cleared of all charges. ==Background== On 26 July 2007, UK tabloid newspaper ''The Daily Star'' reported that it had discovered an online text story about British pop group Girls Aloud that it described as "a chilling story detailing each singer's gory death in scenes that could be straight out of a horror movie", characterizing its author as "a vile internet psycho" and "a cyber-sicko". The news story said that ''The Daily Star'' had reported the content of the hosting website, "Kristen Archives" (a subsite of the ASSTR archive), to the Internet Watch Foundation, and that the IWF had traced the site to the US. It also claimed that Interpol had been notified to help track down the site's operators and the writer of the story. An IWF spokesperson was reported as saying that since the site was hosted in the US, it fell outside the organization's remit, but that they were aware of the site. The spokesperson added that the site also contained "child abuse fantasy stories" and that they had passed on details of it to the British police.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Walker」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.